Motor pricing in 2026: what “average premium” headlines are missing

Every couple of weeks, another “top 10 most expensive places to insure your car” chart does the rounds. Manchester vs London. North vs South. Young drivers vs everyone else.

They make good infographics and sensationalist headlines, but they do not help anyone make an informed decision.

From our perspective, these headlines create three problems at once:

• They ignore the effect of customer mix.
• They ignore how quickly the market is moving.
• They anchor expectations around numbers that are not comparable.

At Pebbles, we have been building data products specifically for pricing teams to cut through that noise. Our new Market Pulse service is designed to give a clean, consistent view of how market premiums are actually moving. This is what we and our clients are seeing so far in 2026.
‍

1. “Average premium” is driven by mix by definition

Any “average premium by region” combines multiple layers of mix:

• Customer mix (age, NCD, claims history, location).
• Vehicle mix (group, fuel type, vehicle age).
• Supply mix (which insurers are active, and how they are trading).

Each of these can materially affect the average, so comparing London to Manchester without adjusting for mix is often misleading. What matters is not the headline average, but how it is moving over time.

Market Pulse addresses mix effects directly. It tracks market premiums for one million quotes every day, built on a bespoke notional portfolio that represents your target customers. You can index premium trends to give a clean view of rate movements over time, with the absolute premium available for context, and you can segment the information by over 50 factors.

This shifts the question from “Which region is more expensive?” to:

“What is the market doing relative to us, and where is the opportunity?”

That is the question pricing teams actually need to answer.
‍

2. Overall trends: stable rates after a volatile April

With a consistent portfolio, we can understand rate change clearly by segments such as region.

At a headline level, the market in 2026 has followed a familiar pattern:

• Rates increased around 4% fairly steadily throughout Q1.
• Rates then softened as March progressed in the usual chase for new vehicle registrations.
• There was noticeable volatility in April.

• A small correction (rate increases) occurred in early April.
• After Easter, rates were a little volatile before reducing and settling back to parity with the start of the month.
• Coincidentally, the overall rate is now at the same level as at the start of the year.

The lack of further rate increases may be premature. There is known, significant inflationary pressure on claims costs; however, it is possible that the industry assumes the observed reduction in claim frequency between 2023 and 2025 will continue through 2026. This is plausible, as there is an inverse correlation between fuel costs and driving miles, and fewer miles driven usually means fewer accidents.

Let us focus on the volatility seen in April.
‍

3. Regional trends: a more nuanced picture than headlines suggest

By region, there are clear differences that explain the volatility noted above.

• Nearly all regions ended April with rates below the start, except for London and the North West.
• London rates peaked at a 10% increase from 1 April and settled at a 5% increase by the end of the month.
• The North West held a 2% rate increase just after Easter until the end of the month, with a slight reduction in the middle of the month.
• Other regions followed a similar shape to London but at a lower rate of change, and generally ended April around 2% below the start of the month.

These observations have practical implications.

• Anti-selection risk Regional spikes (for example, London) will directly impact conversion, and that impact from the market can now be quantified for a specific region rather than assumed.
• Premium forecasting Many plans assume a generic 6% premium inflation. That may hold in some regions but not others. For example, London and the North West have seen rate increases over 2026 up to the end of April. These are regions where it could be efficient to put through rate increases without harming volumes, recognising that other regions’ rates may be too soft to compete in while maintaining long-term profitability.
• Distribution dynamics Brokers still play a significant role in motor distribution, and brokers affected by regional differences will want to react immediately. They remember and support insurers that help them protect their customer base.

A map of “most expensive regions” is visually appealing, but pricing decisions are driven by momentum – where rates are moving, not just where they are.
‍

4. Age: pressure is shifting, not disappearing

Policyholder age (or variations of it) remains one of the most important pricing dimensions, but the pattern in 2026 is not what many would expect.

Historically, younger drivers have absorbed the majority of rate pressure. So far this April 2026, the picture is different.

• Drivers aged 65+ have seen the largest rate increases (around +2%).
• Over 55s saw significant rate increases over the month, which tailed off towards the end of April to reach parity.
• Younger drivers (under 25s) have seen rate reductions of around 3%.

In absolute terms, nothing surprising:

• Younger drivers remain the most expensive.
• Older drivers continue to sit well below average, often under £500.

But the usual rate change patterns have shifted. Perhaps it is the pressure of chasing GWP, with the classic optimisation pattern of losing three £400 policies to gain one £1,500 policy. Or perhaps the reduction in frequency is concentrated at younger ages, and that segment genuinely deserves rate decreases. Either way, by seeing the rate of change in market price at a segment level, you can make informed decisions on how to meet GWP targets and move quickly to take advantage of opportunities.
‍

5. Geography and age interact – and portfolios feel that

With a million quotes a day, you can look at region by age and still have around 100,000 quotes on each cut – enough to make an informed decision.

Market Pulse shows that:

• In London, the overall 5% rate increase in April was driven mainly by ages 25 to 45. Under 24s ended the month with 4% increases and were the only London age group that saw any rate decreases during April.
• Across the North West, rate changes were similar across all age groups, except under 24s, who saw a slight rate decrease of around 1%.
• Every other age group saw a mix of increases between 1% and 5%.
• The highest increases were seen by over 65s.

Those are significant differences, especially when competing on mass‑volume channels such as price comparison websites. They create clear opportunities to grow or defend your portfolio.
‍

6. Using Market Pulse as a forward‑looking signal

Market Pulse was built to give UK motor teams a consistent external view of how premiums are moving across more than 50 common rating factors, based on one million quotes per day. It combines real quote data with Pebbles’ modelling to produce a decision‑ready view of the market.

It helps most in three areas.

• Rate strategy Understand whether your changes are ahead of, in line with, or behind the market at a segment level.
• Portfolio steering Explain movements in conversion and written premium in the context of market change.
• Trading conversations Give pricing, underwriting and distribution teams a shared, objective view of “what the market is doing”.

The aim is simple: stop guessing what the market is doing and start measuring it every day.
‍

Final thought

The industry and the press will keep producing maps of “most expensive places to insure a car”. But if you are running a motor book, the more useful question is:

Where are rates actually moving for our target customers?

That is the question Market Pulse is designed to answer

‍